Skip to content

Codepolice

  • ⤫

Low code is coming: do full-stack developers still get paid more?

Posted by Judy Alvarez Posted on December 8, 2022December 8, 2022
0

In 2022, there has been a growing demand for low-code and full-stack programming. As technology continues to evolve, so does the need for more efficient and cost-effective development solutions. As such, it is important to understand the current trends in the industry and how they could affect salaries, project budgets, and development cycles in 2023.

This article guide will explore the differences between low-code and full-stack programming salaries, project budgets, and development cycles in 2023.

Low-Code Programming Salaries

Low-code programming is typically seen to reduce costs and speed up the development process. As such, salaries for low-code programmers tend to be slightly lower than those of full-stack programmers. What is the annual salary of a low-code developer? It’s difficult to answer because we can’t predict how managers calculate one man’s velocity. Globe News Wire predicts that low-code platforms will generate $187 billion in revenue globally by 2030.

According to sometimes-believed Gartner, most companies (80%) will have this type of developer salary policy only by 2024. This is because low-code programming requires less technical knowledge and experience compared to full-stack programming. Furthermore, as the demand for low-code solutions increases, so will the salaries for those skilled in some project.

Full-Stack Programming Salaries

One of the main reasons for low-code projected growth is how attractive it is to business and how it (by the headlines, of course) reduces app development time. We know that application development always begins with identifying needs. Ideas that drive the overall effort and provide a starting point. Unfortunately we have difficult financial projects.

Full-stack programming is still seen as the gold standard for development and thus commands higher salaries than low-code programming. This is because full-stack programmers need to have a comprehensive understanding of the entire tech stack, including front-end, back-end, databases, and other components. As the demand for full-stack programming continues to increase, salaries for full-stack programmers are expected to rise as well.

Project Budgets

Now, 72% of IT leaders say their backlog is a hindrance to strategic projects. In fact, they spend a lot of time maintaining legacy systems. There are many ways to achieve the goal of creating a working application that performs its primary function while providing high performance and stability. As such, components are the focal point of most technologies.

Project budgets for low-code and full-stack programming solutions vary depending on the complexity of the project and the skillset of the programmer. Low-code projects seem to be more cost-effective since they require less technical knowledge and experience. However, full-stack projects usually require more resources and thus have a higher budget.

Development Cycles

A study conducted by McKinsey found that 45% of his projects exceeded their original budgets, and the performance gap was 56% smaller than he had originally expected. So, the most important part surely is that the development cycle both for low-code and full-stack programming solutions also vary depending on the complexity of the project.

Low-code solutions tend to have shorter development cycles since the code is already written and the programmer only needs to customize it for the project. On the other hand, full-stack programming solutions require more time and effort to complete, thus resulting in longer development cycles.

Conclusion

Low-code programming salaries tend to be lower than those of full-stack programmers, while project budgets for low-code solutions are typically more cost-effective. Finally, development cycles for low-code solutions tend to be shorter than those of full-stack solutions. As the demand for low-code and full-stack programming continues to rise, it is important to understand the differences between the two in order to make informed decisions.

Sources:

Low-code and no-code platforms – Statistics & Facts | Statista
Low-Code vs. No-Code: What’s the Difference? | IBM
With Flatlogic Platform, you build the structure of your application, choosing the stack of popular technologies and choosing the design you need. Web apps generated on the Flatlogic platform are super easy to create and maintain. The app you get is a sort of CMS for the entities defined in the database schema. It has a front-end, back-end, and database completely ready to use and download.  As a result, you get a fully functioning CRUD application based on React, Vue, Angular, NodeJS, or Laravel, that is ready to work with. Test our web app builder for yourself!  Build Your Full Stack Web Application!
✨ Read more:  

  • Ways to remove event listeners
  • SQL in your JavaScript
  • Astro 2.0 and TypeScript 5.0 beta
  • Automating the desktop with Node
  • Why document.write() is bad

Categories: JavascriptTagged: full stack, low code

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Debug and fix the z-index bug in IE6 and IE7
Next Next post: Comparing Node.js job schedulers

Related Posts

  • Ways to remove event listeners

    #​624 — February 3, 2023 Read on the Web JavaScript Weekly You’ve Got Options for Removing Event Listeners — Unnecessary event listeners can cause all sorts of odd problems so it’s good to clean them up when you don’t need them anymore. How? There are several approaches and Alex looks at their pros and cons. (once

    Posted by Posted on February 3, 2023
    0
  • SQL in your JavaScript

    #​472 — February 2, 2023 Read on the Web AlaSQL.js 3.0: Isomorphic JavaScript SQL Database — A SQL database you can use in Node.js and the browser. The interesting bit, for me, is how it opens up the idea of using SQL to query JavaScript objects – as in this example. “The library adds the

    Posted by Posted on February 2, 2023
    0
  • Astro 2.0 and TypeScript 5.0 beta

    #​623 — January 27, 2023 Read on the Web JavaScript Weekly Astro 2.0: The Next-Gen ‘Islands’-Oriented Web Framework — 2.0 includes hybrid rendering (mixing of SSR and SSG outputs), type safety for Markdown & MDX, and an upgrade to Vite 4.0. Astro is worth exploring when performance is key as it works with popular frameworks

    Posted by Posted on January 27, 2023
    0
  • Automating the desktop with Node

    #​471 — January 26, 2023 Read on the Web Nut.js 3.0: Use Node for Desktop Automation — Take control of your desktop environment (Windows, macOS or Linux) from code with control over keyboard and pointer, plus you get some image matching possibilities too. Open source but with optional sponsor-only extension packages. GitHub repo and what’s new

    Posted by Posted on January 26, 2023
    0
  • Why document.write() is bad

    #​622 — January 20, 2023 Read on the Web JavaScript Weekly Why Not document.write()? — Many moons ago, document.write was a mainstay of client-side JavaScript code, but it’s long been considered a bad practice – why? Harry digs in, noting that it “guarantees both a blocking fetch and a blocking execution, which holds up the

    Posted by Posted on January 20, 2023
    0
  • We’re going on a memory leak hunt

    #​470 — January 19, 2023 Read on the Web Fixing a Memory Leak in a Production Node App — Kent encountered a variety of weird memory and CPU usage spikes in his Node-powered app and decided to figure out what was going on. This post walks through his complete journey, with plenty of side problems

    Posted by Posted on January 19, 2023
    0
Judy Alvarez

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Codepolice

  • Github
  • Atlassian
  • Flatlogic
  • Xero
  • Jetbrains
  • Figma
  • Ways to remove event listeners
  • SQL in your JavaScript
  • Astro 2.0 and TypeScript 5.0 beta
  • Automating the desktop with Node
  • Why document.write() is bad
https://flatlogic.com/generator
COPYRIGHT © 2023 - Codepolice